Jeon (pan-fried dishes)

Jeon is a kind of Korean pancake.  Mushrooms, pumpkin, slices of dried fish, oysters, unripened red peppers, meat, or other ingredients are mixed with salt and black pepper, dipped in flour and egg and then fried in oil.

During the national holiday in Korea such as Seol-nal, Chu-Seok, each home make Jeon and eat them.

I like Jeon and I’m looking forward to the upcoming Seol-nal (national holiday in Korea)

“Bowling for Columbine’s” saving grace is the fact that Moore doesn’t have all the answers to his questions. He holds up one cliched theory after another about the root causes of American violence, and punctures holes in most of them.

The movie isn’t saying that guns in themselves are the problem, even if it demonizes Charlton Heston and the NRA for their extraordinary insensitivity. Canada, he points out, is as gun-obsessed as the U.S. Canadians own 7 million guns. They are subjected to the same barrage of violence in movies and music. They too suffer from poverty and unemployment and have a multiethnic population.

Yet in the same year that 11,127 people were murdered by guns in the U.S., only 165 were killed in Canada. There’s a very funny sequence in which Moore goes from house to house in Toronto and discovers that nobody bothers to lock their doors there.  Those unlocked Canadian doors get at the heart of Moore’s argument, for what he sees in America is a culture ruled by fear, a fear fueled by the news media and the politicians and exploited for profit and power, a fear disproportionate to any real danger.

Moore’s thesis comes via Barry Glassner, a University of Southern California professor and the author of “The Culture of Fear.” It’s a provocative argument, though one formulated before the events of 9-11. Not that our very real anxieties about terrorism

It’s not historical. It’s not amount of guns.

We are safe. we live in society with interacting neighborhood.

But we are just under the fear.

Write an advertisement for Habitat for Humanity that might appear in a magazine or newspaper. Explain why it would be a worthwhile experience to volunteer.

Do you want to change the world?

There is simple way.

If you want to change the world, you should change the your mind.

First, I change the mind, and then other people change too.

It is like domino.

Your help could be better world.

Just change it.

http://blog.naver.com/PostView.nhn?blogId=bjt0709&Redirect=View&logNo=130073954033&isAfterWrite=true&isMrblogPost=false&reqparam=&isHappyBeanLeverage=true&contentLength=562&redirect=View&widgetTypeCall=true

This series is about how those in power have used Freud’s theories to try and control the dangerous crowd in an age of mass democracy. The Century of the Self is grand in its scope. It seeks to analyze the different conceptions of the self in the twentieth century, and how these conceptions were ultimately used by corporations to manipulate consumers into purchasing their products. This video seeks to tell a story about the relationship between the differing conceptions of individualism and the capitalist, democratic institutions (corporations and governments) which organize themselves around these conceptions.

The central figure in this story is Edward Bernays – the father of public relations. He was influenced by his uncle Sigmund Freud. He took Freud’s key thesis that individuals were driven by unconscious irrational forces and used it to develop marketing techniques which are now common place today. Some of the examples described in the documentary are priceless – some so ridiculous sounding that one almost doubts the veracity of the accounts.

One example is the campaign to convince women to smoke. He was told by a psychoanalyst that cigarettes were seen as a source of male sexual power, and that if he could associate the act of smoking with a sort of challenge to that power, then women would flock to it – the cigarette, a phallic symbol, would satisfy women’s penis envy. He organised a group of women to light up cigarettes in a parade at a given cue. He also told the press that he had heard that some suffragettes were planning to light up ‘torches of freedom’ – in a protest against male patriarchial society.

Such examples are common throughout the documentary series – but they illustrate the key idea that people could be turned into pliable consumers by harnessing their irrational fears and drives and associating, through symbols, products to the satisfaction of those drives. This idea remains constant throughout the historical narrative that Curtis weaves. What changes are the varying attitudes to these unconscious drives – and the way the sense of the individual self evolves throughout the century.

Bernays had seen his techniques as the means for producing stable democracies – people were to be made placid and compliant through the satisfaction of their irrational desires with products.

 They were not to be trusted – and an elite political and corporate class was to ensure that these desires were sufficiently placated – but decision making, policy creation and ultimate power were to reside with this elite, not the people. As the new assertive, unrepressed self emerges, however, this state of affairs can no longer continue. While it is fine for the corporations who can continue to sell their products unabated, politicians are forced to play a similar game, and the creation of policy increasingly becomes determined by the whims of the demos.

 In Korea, after democracy demonstration, society faced new circumstances in 1987.

Mr. Noh Tae-Woo focused on president’s election to keep power. Mr. Noh seemed like politician from military forces. Mr. Noh professed ordinary people for getting rid of military government called Park Jeong-Hee and Jeon Doo-Hwan. Finally He elected president in Korea 1987.

 Do you think you will be the same way when you are that age?

http://blog.naver.com/PostView.nhn?blogId=bjt0709&Redirect=View&isMrblogPost=false&reqparam=&isHappyBeanLeverage=true&contentLength=487&logNo=130073202382&parentCategoryNo=23&isAfterWrite=true&redirect=View&widgetTypeCall=true

I think that it is natural that scientist research a nature with more developing technology.

 All nature have developed. Human is too. More developed a technology, more scientist try to research a nature with their curious.

 People tend to live longer. So scientist should continue to look the secrets to live longer.  That is natural.

 I think that people should know a nature. But by developing a nature, science will cause side an effect. For example, people will be getting older with developing nature.

So older people will cause many social problem, such as an annuity.

click

http://blog.naver.com/PostView.nhn?blogId=bjt0709&Redirect=View&logNo=130072681889&parentCategoryNo=23&isAfterWrite=true&redirect=View&widgetTypeCall=true

I think that there are not any benefit of teaching apes to communicate with humans.

Apes have own way that they have lived and Humans have own way that they have lived in the Earth. They didn’t share any particular way of life.

If humans teach apes to communicate with them, they may misuse ability.

Apes are themselves and Humans are themselves. They have each world.